Monday, January 11, 2016

B1 - Group B - Yasmina Shields

Building information modeling (BIM) technology in the construction industry offers a number of benefits to facilitate the design and construction process. Some of its applications include 3D renderings, incorporating fabrication and shop drawings into the model, code reviews, cost estimating, construction sequencing, forensic analysis, and facilities management (yielding the BIM model still useful after construction is complete). Also by simulating a virtual model of a building, BIM software can also be used to run a clash analysis between mechanical and structural systems—which helps to avoid construction issues, in turn reducing unforeseen costs (savings of about 10% of the contract value have been made through clash detections, according to Azhar’s “Building Information Modeling (BIM): Trends, Benefits, Risks, and Challenges for the AEC Industry”).

In high school I was told that BIM was the technology of the future, next “big thing,” while interning at an architecture firm. Five years later while on co-op for a general contractor, I found that most of my coworkers had not even heard of it; a few were talking of incorporating it in future projects, but it did not seem to be gaining much ground. The technology is readily available, yet there still exists managerial and technical concerns. The main challenges that are hindering widespread use of BIM is that no standardized process nor defined guidelines for BIM use exists, and ways to reduce the learning curve of BIM trainees need to be considered.

As a fundamental building material in construction and the most used substance on earth (other than water), concrete is a large emitter of CO2, with about a ton of CO2 being released for every ton of cement produced. Dr. Behrokh Khoshnevis of USC has developed Contour Crafting system, which works like a conventional 3-D printer—building up layer by layer—but instead uses a fast-drying concrete mix. The concrete material is precisely extruded with near-zero waste, needing less concrete and reducing its negative environmental impact. This is similar to the 3-D printed buildings that companies such as WinSun are developing, as mentioned in blog posts by Danielle Schroeder and others. Contour Crafting is also an automated process, making construction less labor intensive and safer. Another added benefit is that complex formwork is no longer needed using this technology in order to make non-rectilinear walls.


Source: http://www.sculpteo.com/blog/2015/10/07/3d-printing-construction/

I have a particular interest in sustainable structures, and thought it worth mentioning Team Orange County’s entry in last year’s Solar Decathlon in this post. Their net-zero-energy, under 1,000 square feet house is mechanically managed by a radiant heating and cooling system along with a rooftop solar panel capture system, and collects storm water for garden use. They also included in their entry a personal 3-D printer and thermoplastic recycling system that allows the user to break down printed objects that are no longer needed around the house, and reuse the material to produce new household tools or parts for home repairs.




Comments to other students:


3 comments:

  1. I had a similar experience in regard to the use of BIM at my last COOP as well. Though BIM has a lot of advanced features such as associating parameter about walls, equipment, etc. it was not properly being used. I think that we are currently in a transition period where Revit is becoming industry standard. However, a lot of older generations who have being used to using software as merely a drafting product are resistant to the change. I think this is largely due to as you mentioned the "learning curve". There definitely is a good amount of effort and knowledge that needs to be acquired before you can really see the benefits of BIM technology such as Revit. Additionally, I would also add that for the purpose of creating construction documents for small scale projects there just is not enough design fee to create an elaborate fully functional model. This may also be a reason why it is difficult for the new technology to permeate.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I had a similar experience in regard to the use of BIM at my last COOP as well. Though BIM has a lot of advanced features such as associating parameter about walls, equipment, etc. it was not properly being used. I think that we are currently in a transition period where Revit is becoming industry standard. However, a lot of older generations who have being used to using software as merely a drafting product are resistant to the change. I think this is largely due to as you mentioned the "learning curve". There definitely is a good amount of effort and knowledge that needs to be acquired before you can really see the benefits of BIM technology such as Revit. Additionally, I would also add that for the purpose of creating construction documents for small scale projects there just is not enough design fee to create an elaborate fully functional model. This may also be a reason why it is difficult for the new technology to permeate.

    ReplyDelete
  3. At my last Co-op, they were in the process of converting from AutoCad to Revit. This ensured a 'battle' in the office space from people who felt AutoCad was easier to use and cheaper to people who felt that Revit was the way to go. Arguments can be made on both sides but I personally feel Revit is the new 'standard'. The clash detection feature of Revit is too valuable to not use. As you said, it could save 10% of the costs. You briefly mentioned that mechanical and structural systems can be integrated into one model, but what I feel is more valuable than the clash detection is the ability to have more than one user working in the project at a time. Revit (on a server) allows multiple people to be in the 'live file', so multiple jobs can be worked on. I believe this is Revits most valuable feature.

    ReplyDelete