There seemed to be a large difference between the first and second in terms of the fluidity of the motion. The first structure relied on precise movements, whereas the second flowed in relation to both the ropes and the other drones. The second structure also showed greater promise for teamwork, with both drones working in close proximity of each other. These three improvements combine to create a more feasible building process, however it did lean heavily on human constructed elements.
What implications does this have for the future of our industry?
- Speed up time
- React to environment
- More feasible structure
- Safer, possibility of creating tethers for harnesses
- Can work at great heights
- Inspection work, not necessarily construction
No comments:
Post a Comment